User talk:Solo

Revision as of 13:19, 18 June 2018 by Finellach (talk | contribs)

@Finellach Looking at how the Poitiers page looks like now, I think there should be a clearer standard format for Personal Arms (possibly without having to make repeats of a further cluttering formula like Arms from Seal ?). Dates for seals and dates for titles aren't clearly identifiable at first look (if it's not obvious to me anymore, I can't imagine the random reader being positive on anything). I don't know maybe dates refering to the testimony could be in italics or use different brackets to distinguish them from biographic dates ?
I formatted all my dates for seals like that, following an existing example (not sure which now but I looked for one before, I'm certain of that). Until now I've really avoided to mix biography and record in the dates because I thought it would confuse things but that's not a solution.

Here are a few random ideas to illustrate what I mean (really randomly trying, not propositions).

Maybe there could be a dummy unlinked dynasty page where we could present all cases and how they should be formatted, something that contributors could refer to in case of a doubt ? (I know you're not but I am a little bit unsure what to use at this point).

Lol oh trust me it confuses me as well. This is one of the issues we have at this moment on the site because we don't have a real consensus nor have ever actually discussed this issue, in fact I think I actually originally went with a style you show here on Chalons arms but Joakim didn't like it. Anyway looking at your suggestions I'd say I really like the 3rd and the last suggestion. You should ask Joakim as well. Finellach (talk)