User talk:Solo

@Finellach Looking at how the Poitiers page looks like now, I think there should be a clearer standard format for Personal Arms (possibly without having to make repeats of a further cluttering formula like Arms from Seal ?). Dates for seals and dates for titles aren't clearly identifiable at first look (if it's not obvious to me anymore, I can't imagine the random reader being positive on anything). I don't know maybe dates refering to the testimony could be in italics or use different brackets to distinguish them from biographic dates ?
I formatted all my dates for seals like that, following an existing example (not sure which now but I looked for one before, I'm certain of that). Until now I've really avoided to mix biography and record in the dates because I thought it would confuse things but that's not a solution.

Here are a few random ideas to illustrate what I mean (really randomly trying, not propositions).

• Personal Arms
• 

  Aymar III de Poitiers
  Count of Valentinois and Diois
  [1270]

• 

  Aymar IV de Poitiers
  Son of the Count of Valentinois
  (Count in 1277)
  [Seal : 1257]

• 

  Amédée de Poitiers
  Lord of Saint Vallier
  Seal, 1337

• 

  Louis II de Poitiers
  Count of Valentinois
  1374-1419
  Arms from Gelre Armorial

• 

  Charles de Poitiers
  Bishop of Châlons (1389–1413)

• 

  Charles de Poitiers
  Bishop of Langres
  1413–1433

• 

  Diane de Poitiers
  Duchess of Valentinois
  (Seal, 1548)

Maybe there could be a dummy unlinked dynasty page where we could present all cases and how they should be formatted, something that contributors could refer to in case of a doubt ? (I know you're not but I am a little bit unsure what to use at this point).