User talk:Finellach: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Great, that saved me some time. :-)
If you've got the time, it would be great if you could help us complete the [[Grand Armorial équestre de la Toison d'or]], given the following sources:
*http://herald-dick-magazine.blogspot.fr/2012/06/heraldique-medievale-le-grand-armorial.html
*http://herald-dick-magazine.blogspot.fr/2013/12/heraldique-medievale-le-grand-armorial.html
*http://herald-dick-magazine.blogspot.fr/2014/11/heraldique-medievale-le-grand-armorial.html
*http://herald-dick-magazine.blogspot.com/search/label/Armorial%20Toison%20d'Or


I will make a combined list of duchies from Peerage of France and Ducs non pairs. [[User:NSamson|NSamson]] ([[User talk:NSamson|talk]])
I am also trying to add to the [[Bergshammar Armorial]], but couldn't find an online source for the identifications of the arms. [[User:NSamson|NSamson]] ([[User talk:NSamson|talk]]) 12:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 
It is what would appear from a regular google search of Louis d'Arpajon, combined with the keywords "arms", "blason" or "wappen," making it the most commonly-recognized (or standard) version of the arms of Louis d'Arpajon. -[[User:NSamson|NSamson]] ([[User talk:NSamson|talk]]) 11:38, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 
Combining elements from different arms would created a fictional arms, so let us avoid doing that. -[[User:NSamson|NSamson]] ([[User talk:NSamson|talk]]) 11:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 
You do not make sense. You say that you despise "incorrect" and "fictional" versions of arms, yet you keep on re-generating an arms made from '''your''' source and '''my''' source, which I will currently call, for clarity's sake, '''chimerical arms,''' since not all of the elements appear on the same source at the same time. Hence, '''chimerical arms''' never existed anywhere in this world before today. -[[User:NSamson|NSamson]] ([[User talk:NSamson|talk]]) 12:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:00, 21 April 2016